-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 312
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add EFS access point support (aws-parallelcluster#2337) #6359
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Thomas Heinen <[email protected]>
@@ -1109,6 +1109,7 @@ def _add_efs_storage(self, id: str, shared_efs: SharedEfs): | |||
shared_efs.encryption_in_transit | |||
) | |||
self.shared_storage_attributes[SharedStorageType.EFS]["IamAuthorizations"].append(shared_efs.iam_authorization) | |||
self.shared_storage_attributes[SharedStorageType.EFS]["AccesspointIds"].append(shared_efs.accesspoint_id) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here and in other files, we are assuming that more than one access point can be specified for a given file system (AccesspointsIds rather than AccesspointId).
It's true that a file system can support multiple access points (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/efs/latest/ug/efs-access-points.html#efs-access-poiont-create), but the mount action is always done using a single access point (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/efs/latest/ug/mounting-access-points.html).
So please, let's assume to specify only one access point on the cluster config.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is actually a per filesystem array, similar to the encryption in transit array
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it's actually an array of all the separate FS in config. I just aligned naming and structure to the other properties which are also named in plural.
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ class EfsMountOptionsValidator(Validator): | |||
IAM Authorization requires Encryption in Transit. | |||
""" | |||
|
|||
def _validate(self, encryption_in_transit: bool, iam_authorization: bool, name: str): | |||
def _validate(self, encryption_in_transit: bool, iam_authorization: bool, accesspoint_id: str, name: str): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change should be captured in unit test here: https://github.com/aws/aws-parallelcluster/blob/develop/cli/tests/pcluster/validators/test_efs_validators.py
@@ -335,6 +335,10 @@ def _add_compute_resource_launch_template( | |||
self._shared_storage_attributes[SharedStorageType.EFS]["IamAuthorizations"], | |||
use_lower_case=True, | |||
), | |||
"efs_accesspoint_ids": to_comma_separated_string( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change should be captured in unit test here: https://github.com/aws/aws-parallelcluster/blob/develop/cli/tests/pcluster/templates/test_queues_stack.py#L114
@@ -235,6 +235,10 @@ def _add_login_nodes_pool_launch_template(self): | |||
self._shared_storage_attributes[SharedStorageType.EFS]["IamAuthorizations"], | |||
use_lower_case=True, | |||
), | |||
"efs_accesspoint_ids": to_comma_separated_string( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change should be captured in unit test here: https://github.com/aws/aws-parallelcluster/blob/develop/cli/tests/pcluster/templates/test_login_nodes_stack.py#L23
@@ -1288,6 +1289,10 @@ def _add_head_node(self): | |||
"efs_iam_authorizations": to_comma_separated_string( | |||
self.shared_storage_attributes[SharedStorageType.EFS]["IamAuthorizations"], use_lower_case=True | |||
), | |||
"efs_accesspoint_ids": to_comma_separated_string( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change should be captured in unit test here: https://github.com/aws/aws-parallelcluster/blob/develop/cli/tests/pcluster/templates/test_cluster_stack.py#L901
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ class EfsMountOptionsValidator(Validator): | |||
IAM Authorization requires Encryption in Transit. | |||
""" | |||
|
|||
def _validate(self, encryption_in_transit: bool, iam_authorization: bool, name: str): | |||
def _validate(self, encryption_in_transit: bool, iam_authorization: bool, accesspoint_id: str, name: str): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The validator should verify that the provided access point exists
Hi @thheinen, Made a first round of review and unblocked PR checks. |
Signed-off-by: Thomas Heinen <[email protected]>
Description of changes
Add support to specify EFS access points per issue #2337
Tests
Tested mounting EFS with and without accesspoints from an aws-parallelcluster cluster.
More tests to be done but opening a draft PR for discussion and early feedback
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.