Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CORE-17437: State Manager Configuration Section #1277

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 9, 2023

Conversation

jujoramos
Copy link
Contributor

Promote State Manager configuration to its own section and remove it
from under the Messaging configuration.

@corda-jenkins-ci02
Copy link
Contributor

corda-jenkins-ci02 bot commented Oct 5, 2023

Jenkins build for PR 1277 build 11

Build Successful:
Jar artifact version produced by this PR: 5.1.0.31-alpha-1696861403394

@jujoramos jujoramos force-pushed the feature/CORE-17437 branch 2 times, most recently from 9acb330 to b27e8c9 Compare October 5, 2023 19:40
@jujoramos
Copy link
Contributor Author

Related runtime-os change: corda/corda-runtime-os#4780

Copy link
Contributor

@conalsmith-r3 conalsmith-r3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just 1


// Database Configuration Values
public static final class Database {
public static final String DB_PROPERTIES = "database";
Copy link
Contributor

@conalsmith-r3 conalsmith-r3 Oct 9, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah that's better, so when users pass config to the stateManagerFactory.create() the configs don't need to be in a "stateManager" level 👍 (i.e. user can listen for changes to "ConfigKeys.STATE_MANAGER_CONFIG" key, and on this change, pass the config at config.getConfig(ConfigKeys.STATE_MANAGER_CONFIG)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Promote State Manager configuration to its own section and remove it
from under the Messaging configuration.
Copy link
Contributor

@conalsmith-r3 conalsmith-r3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jujoramos jujoramos merged commit edc6b36 into corda:release/os/5.1 Oct 9, 2023
@jujoramos jujoramos deleted the feature/CORE-17437 branch October 9, 2023 16:08
jujoramos added a commit to jujoramos/corda-api that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants