Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix lint #2685

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 26, 2024
Merged

Fix lint #2685

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 26, 2024

Conversation

sainak
Copy link
Member

@sainak sainak commented Dec 26, 2024

Merge Checklist

  • Tests added/fixed
  • Update docs in /docs
  • Linting Complete
  • Any other necessary step

Only PR's with test cases included and passing lint and test pipelines will be reviewed

@ohcnetwork/care-backend-maintainers @ohcnetwork/care-backend-admins

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new target in the Makefile to load dummy data into the backend service easily.
  • Chores

    • Updated the .gitattributes file to ensure proper handling of shell script files.

@sainak sainak requested a review from a team as a code owner December 26, 2024 05:45
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 26, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a minor update to the .gitattributes file for shell script handling and adds a new load-dummy-data target to the Makefile. The .gitattributes change ensures consistent line endings for shell scripts, while the Makefile addition provides a convenient method to populate the backend service with dummy data using Docker Compose.

Changes

File Change Summary
.gitattributes Modified line endings configuration for shell script files
Makefile Added load-dummy-data target for loading test data via Docker Compose

Poem

🐚 Shell scripts aligned, just so
Docker whispers, data will flow
A Makefile tweak, oh so neat
Dummy data's now a simple feat
Version control's subtle art 🎨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ab093e4 and e7423f2.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .gitattributes (1 hunks)
  • Makefile (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .gitattributes
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Makefile (1)

33-33: Thank you for improving readability with proper spacing.

The added empty line helps maintain consistent spacing between target definitions.

Comment on lines 34 to 35
load-dummy-data:
docker compose exec backend bash -c "python manage.py load_dummy_data"
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Dec 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

The new target should be marked as .PHONY

I couldn't help but notice that this target isn't marked as .PHONY like its siblings. We wouldn't want it feeling left out, would we?

Add the target to the .PHONY declaration at the top:

-.PHONY: logs
+.PHONY: logs load-dummy-data

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh really, can you explain why that target needs to be marked as .PHONY

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sainak Typically, a Make target is marked as .PHONY when it doesn’t correspond to a real file—this tells Make it should always run that target’s commands. If there happened to be a file named load-dummy-data in the project folder, Make might see it as “already up to date” and skip the recipe. Declaring it as .PHONY prevents that confusion and guarantees the target always does its job.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.48%. Comparing base (ab093e4) to head (e7423f2).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #2685   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    70.48%   70.48%           
========================================
  Files          201      201           
  Lines        11439    11439           
  Branches      1164     1164           
========================================
  Hits          8063     8063           
  Misses        3014     3014           
  Partials       362      362           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@vigneshhari vigneshhari merged commit bde8acf into develop Dec 26, 2024
8 checks passed
@vigneshhari vigneshhari deleted the sainak/fix/lint branch December 26, 2024 06:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants