Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix,doc: condition of the max number of 1s inside a shape. #3243

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 28, 2024

Conversation

SGSSGene
Copy link
Contributor

Addresses a documentation issue that showed up in issue: #3242

The Attention box describes the number of 1s inside an shape. The condition is the wrong way. They described the
rejection criteria, not the accept criteria:
https://docs.seqan.de/seqan3/3.4.0/group__search__views.html#ga6e598d6a021868f704d39df73252974f

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 28, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
seqan3 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 28, 2024 10:15am

@seqan-actions seqan-actions added lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting and removed lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting labels Feb 28, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.17%. Comparing base (0acc8e3) to head (1a09654).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3243   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.17%   98.17%           
=======================================
  Files         269      269           
  Lines       11856    11856           
=======================================
  Hits        11640    11640           
  Misses        216      216           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@eseiler eseiler enabled auto-merge February 28, 2024 10:27
@eseiler eseiler merged commit 3e63456 into seqan:main Feb 28, 2024
34 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants