Configure Ceph RGW with a object storage network #2301
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks for the PR! ❤️ |
fultonj
force-pushed
the
net
branch
2 times, most recently
from
7096663 to
aa81cc1
Compare
|
This change depends on a change that failed to merge. Change openstack-k8s-operators/architecture#386 is needed. |
fultonj
added a commit
to fultonj/architecture
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 4, 2024
When Ceph RGW is used, an endpoint for Swift storage is hosted not in a pod on k8s but on an EDPM node. Thus, a service hosted on an EDPM node will need to be accessed by cloud users from a separate network. This patch adds the Swift storage network (swift) with VLAN 25 and range 172.22.0.0/24 in the HCI values example. The Swift network is configured on the HCI EDPM nodes and an NNCP, NAD, L2Advertisement and IPAddressPool are defined so that a pod in k8s can connect to it; such as the tempest pod which will perform object storage tests. In order to make these changes va/hci now keeps its own copy of the nncp and networking directories since they differ (by the new network) from the generic ones in the lib directory. Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPRH-6675 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#2301 Signed-off-by: John Fulton <[email protected]>
fultonj
commented
Sep 4, 2024
fultonj
added a commit
to fultonj/architecture
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 4, 2024
When Ceph RGW is used, an endpoint for Swift storage is hosted not in a pod on k8s but on an EDPM node. Thus, a service hosted on an EDPM node will need to be accessed by cloud users from a separate network. This patch adds the Swift storage network (swift) with VLAN 25 and range 172.22.0.0/24 in the HCI values example. The Swift network is configured on the HCI EDPM nodes and an NNCP, NAD, L2Advertisement and IPAddressPool are defined so that a pod in k8s can connect to it; such as the tempest pod which will perform object storage tests. In order to make these changes va/hci now keeps its own copy of the nncp and networking directories since they differ (by the new network) from the generic ones in the lib directory. Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPRH-6675 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#2301 Signed-off-by: John Fulton <[email protected]>
|
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/ee21a0187a9d4994bce1b1df1f664c44 ✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 2h 06m 29s |
fultonj
added a commit
to fultonj/architecture
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 5, 2024
When Ceph RGW is used, an endpoint for Swift storage is hosted not in a pod on k8s but on an EDPM node. Thus, a service hosted on an EDPM node will need to be accessed by cloud users from a separate network. This patch adds the Swift storage network (swift) with VLAN 25 and range 172.22.0.0/24 in the HCI values example. The Swift network is configured on the HCI EDPM nodes and an NNCP, NAD, L2Advertisement and IPAddressPool are defined so that a pod in k8s can connect to it; such as the tempest pod which will perform object storage tests. In order to make these changes va/hci now keeps its own copy of the nncp and networking directories since they differ (by the new network) from the generic ones in the lib directory. Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPRH-6675 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#2301 Signed-off-by: John Fulton <[email protected]>
fultonj
commented
Sep 5, 2024
fultonj
force-pushed
the
net
branch
2 times, most recently
from
61a95bb to
23eeae2
Compare
fultonj
added a commit
to fultonj/architecture
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 5, 2024
When Ceph RGW is used, an endpoint for Swift storage is hosted not in a pod on k8s but on an EDPM node. Thus, a service hosted on an EDPM node will need to be accessed by cloud users from a separate network. This patch adds the Swift storage network (swift) with VLAN 25 and range 172.22.0.0/24 in the HCI values example. The Swift network is configured on the HCI EDPM nodes and an NNCP, NAD, L2Advertisement and IPAddressPool are defined so that a pod in k8s can connect to it; such as the tempest pod which will perform object storage tests. In order to make these changes va/hci now keeps its own copy of the nncp and networking directories since they differ (by the new network) from the generic ones in the lib directory. Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPRH-6675 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#2301 Signed-off-by: John Fulton <[email protected]>
fultonj
force-pushed
the
net
branch
2 times, most recently
from
2e70376 to
98569d4
Compare
|
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/5297f3bae143457daeb1c7d2b242812f ✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 1h 55m 22s |
fultonj
added a commit
to fultonj/architecture
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 17, 2024
When Ceph RGW is used, an endpoint for Swift storage is hosted not in a pod on k8s but on an EDPM node. Thus, a service hosted on an EDPM node will need to be accessed by cloud users from a separate network. This patch adds the Swift storage network (swift) with VLAN 25 and range 172.22.0.0/24 in the HCI values example. The Swift network is configured on the HCI EDPM nodes and an NNCP, NAD, L2Advertisement and IPAddressPool are defined so that a pod in k8s can connect to it; such as the tempest pod which will perform object storage tests. In order to make these changes va/hci now keeps its own copy of the nncp and networking directories since they differ (by the new network) from the generic ones in the lib directory. Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPRH-6675 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#2301 Signed-off-by: John Fulton <[email protected]>
fultonj
added a commit
to fultonj/architecture
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2024
When Ceph RGW is used, an endpoint for Swift storage is hosted not in a pod on k8s but on an EDPM node. Thus, a service hosted on an EDPM node will need to be accessed by cloud users from a separate network. This patch adds the Swift storage network (swift) with VLAN 25 and range 172.22.0.0/24 in the HCI values example. The Swift network is configured on the HCI EDPM nodes and an NNCP, NAD, L2Advertisement and IPAddressPool are defined so that a pod in k8s can connect to it; such as the tempest pod which will perform object storage tests. Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPRH-6675 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#2301 Signed-off-by: John Fulton <[email protected]>
When Ceph RGW is used, an endpoint for Swift storage is hosted not in a pod on k8s but on an EDPM node. Thus, a service hosted on an EDPM node will need to be accessed from a separate network. This patch adds the Swift storage network (swift) with VLAN 25 and range 172.22.0.0/24 in the reproducers networking-definition.yml. It also adds a multus range for this network so that the Tempest pod can access this network for testing. The Swift storage network is added to the OCP nodes for the same reason. The swift network is also added to the ci playbook networking-env-definition for the rhoso-architecture-validate-hci github-check. The Ceph playbook cifmw_cephadm_rgw_network parameter may then be set to the new swift network so that RGW is then configured on a separate network. If this network parameter is not set, then the storage network is used. Signed-off-by: John Fulton <[email protected]>
fultonj
added a commit
to fultonj/architecture
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2024
When Ceph RGW is used, an endpoint for Swift storage is hosted not in a pod on k8s but on an EDPM node. Thus, a service hosted on an EDPM node will need to be accessed by cloud users from a separate network. This patch adds the Swift storage network (swift) with VLAN 25 and range 172.22.0.0/24 in the HCI values example. The Swift network is configured on the HCI EDPM nodes and an NNCP, NAD, L2Advertisement and IPAddressPool are defined so that a pod in k8s can connect to it; such as the tempest pod which will perform object storage tests. Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPRH-6675 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#2301 Signed-off-by: John Fulton <[email protected]>
fultonj
added a commit
to fultonj/architecture
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2024
When Ceph RGW is used, an endpoint for Swift storage is hosted not in a pod on k8s but on an EDPM node. Thus, a service hosted on an EDPM node will need to be accessed by cloud users from a separate network. This patch adds the Swift storage network (swift) with VLAN 25 and range 172.22.0.0/24 in the HCI values example. The Swift network is configured on the HCI EDPM nodes and an NNCP, NAD, L2Advertisement and IPAddressPool are defined so that a pod in k8s can connect to it; such as the tempest pod which will perform object storage tests. Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPRH-6675 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#2301 Signed-off-by: John Fulton <[email protected]>
fultonj
added a commit
to fultonj/architecture
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2024
When Ceph RGW is used, an endpoint for Swift storage is hosted not in a pod on k8s but on an EDPM node. Thus, a service hosted on an EDPM node will need to be accessed by cloud users from a separate network. This patch adds the Swift storage network (swift) with VLAN 25 and range 172.22.0.0/24 in the HCI values example. The Swift network is configured on the HCI EDPM nodes and an NNCP, NAD, L2Advertisement and IPAddressPool are defined so that a pod in k8s can connect to it; such as the tempest pod which will perform object storage tests. Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPRH-6675 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#2301 Signed-off-by: John Fulton <[email protected]>
|
@abays @fmount @cjeanner @pablintino A test project (uni03gamma-rhel9-rhoso18.0-titan105-ceph) which depends on this patch is green so we are safe to merge. |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: pablintino, rebtoor The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/lgtm |
|
Thank you @fultonj @rebtoor @pablintino ! |
openshift-merge-bot
bot
merged commit 531e001
into
openstack-k8s-operators:main
5 checks passed
|
/cherrypick 18.0.0-proposed |
|
@fultonj: new pull request created: #2384 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
fultonj
added a commit
to fultonj/ci-framework
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 26, 2024
Use the existing `cifmw_cephadm_monitoring_network` parameter to configure the Ceph dashboard instead of the `cifmw_cephadm_rgw_network` parameter. This was not detected earlier because the Ceph playbook set them both to the Ceph public_network, but we recently added a feature to run RGW on a separate network [1]. Also, add retries/delay to the dashboard HTTP check. [1] openstack-k8s-operators#2301 Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPCIX-506 Signed-off-by: John Fulton <[email protected]>
fultonj
added a commit
to fultonj/ci-framework
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2024
Use the existing `cifmw_cephadm_monitoring_network` parameter to configure the Ceph dashboard instead of the `cifmw_cephadm_rgw_network` parameter. This was not detected earlier because the Ceph playbook set them both to the Ceph public_network, but we recently added a feature to run RGW on a separate network [1]. Also, add retries/delay to the dashboard HTTP check and mange if HTTPS should be used. [1] openstack-k8s-operators#2301 Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPCIX-506 Signed-off-by: John Fulton <[email protected]>
fultonj
added a commit
to fultonj/ci-framework
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2024
Use the existing `cifmw_cephadm_monitoring_network` parameter to configure the Ceph dashboard instead of the `cifmw_cephadm_rgw_network` parameter. This was not detected earlier because the Ceph playbook set them both to the Ceph public_network, but we recently added a feature to run RGW on a separate network [1]. Also, add retries/delay to the dashboard HTTP check and mange if HTTPS should be used. [1] openstack-k8s-operators#2301 Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPCIX-506 Signed-off-by: John Fulton <[email protected]>
fultonj
added a commit
to fultonj/ci-framework
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2024
Use the existing `cifmw_cephadm_monitoring_network` parameter to configure the Ceph dashboard instead of the `cifmw_cephadm_rgw_network` parameter. This was not detected earlier because the Ceph playbook set them both to the Ceph public_network, but we recently added a feature to run RGW on a separate network [1]. Also, add retries/delay to the dashboard HTTP check and mange if HTTPS should be used. [1] openstack-k8s-operators#2301 Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPCIX-506 Signed-off-by: John Fulton <[email protected]>
openshift-merge-bot bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2024
Use the existing `cifmw_cephadm_monitoring_network` parameter to configure the Ceph dashboard instead of the `cifmw_cephadm_rgw_network` parameter. This was not detected earlier because the Ceph playbook set them both to the Ceph public_network, but we recently added a feature to run RGW on a separate network [1]. Also, add retries/delay to the dashboard HTTP check and mange if HTTPS should be used. [1] #2301 Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPCIX-506 Signed-off-by: John Fulton <[email protected]>
fultonj
added a commit
to fultonj/ci-framework
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2024
Use the existing `cifmw_cephadm_monitoring_network` parameter to configure the Ceph dashboard instead of the `cifmw_cephadm_rgw_network` parameter. This was not detected earlier because the Ceph playbook set them both to the Ceph public_network, but we recently added a feature to run RGW on a separate network [1]. Also, add retries/delay to the dashboard HTTP check and mange if HTTPS should be used. [1] openstack-k8s-operators#2301 Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPCIX-506 (cherry-picked from f6e4645) Signed-off-by: John Fulton <[email protected]>
openshift-merge-bot bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 30, 2024
Use the existing `cifmw_cephadm_monitoring_network` parameter to configure the Ceph dashboard instead of the `cifmw_cephadm_rgw_network` parameter. This was not detected earlier because the Ceph playbook set them both to the Ceph public_network, but we recently added a feature to run RGW on a separate network [1]. Also, add retries/delay to the dashboard HTTP check and mange if HTTPS should be used. [1] #2301 Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPCIX-506 (cherry-picked from f6e4645) Signed-off-by: John Fulton <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When Ceph RGW is used, an endpoint for object storage is hosted not in a pod on k8s but on an EDPM node. Thus, a service hosted on an EDPM node will need to be accessed from a separate network.
This patch adds the object storage network (storageobj) with VLAN 25 and range 172.22.0.0/24 in the reproducers networking-definition.yml. It also adds a multus range for this network so that the Tempest pod can access this network for testing. The object storage network is added to the OCP nodes for the same reason.
The Ceph playbook cifmw_cephadm_rgw_network parameter may then be set to the new network so that object storage may be configured on a separate network. If this network is parameter is not set, then the storage network is used.
Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPRH-6675